Saturday, October 5, 2024

Is it possible to include consciousness in scientific work?

Existential science.  Is it a term, which may denote the connections I have found over the last 20 years? I have found completely new paths related to life itself and the background for all life. Could it have been consciousness that made the compact light mass that existed in the beginning, expand? In Stephen Hawking's big bang theory, it was an explosion... could there have been a thought intention behind it?

I believe that science must relate in new ways to CONSCIOUSNESS. It has been like this for the last 3-400 years, that a science developed which focused on what could be observed and studied via the physical senses. Then logical conclusions were drawn from what could be seen physically to be true. They forgot to study the part of the human being that is consciousness.

I therefore claim that the particles must have conscious qualities and that this is easy to demonstrate by studying what the physicists have found about atoms. It is important in the larger context.

But I have not only worked with the micro level in my philosophical studies of existence. In recent years I have also looked at the macro level, and found that EVERYTHING that exists must once have been ONE coherent light organism. As the physicists' theory is, I also believe that everything that exists was once one compact mass of light. While the physicists believe that the compact mass spread in the Cosmos due to a huge explosion, I am certain that there had to be consciousness behind the expansion that took place at the beginning of existence.

Both Stephen Hawking's theory of "The Big Bang" and the ability I have developed to communicate with higher dimensions led me to the understanding of the origin that I convey today. Both Albert Einstein and Stephen Hawking were philosophers in addition to being physicists, but they had the drawback that they were scientists of the school that Galilei and Decartes had started through studies of the physical phenomena. So although Descartes in his philosophy came to consciousness in his understanding by the famous statement, "I think, therefore I am", he did not progress in relation to including consciousness in natural science.

 I therefore claim that EVERYTHING was once ONE coherent, compact mass of light and that there was a conscious point in that mass of light that decided to divide the large mass into pieces as large as the point itself. With that thought intention, the compact sea of ​​light was divided into pieces, which became what we know today as particles. All mass and all consciousness are thus to be considered as if they are parts of the "body" of the one point of consciousness. I often call it "The Source", but in my writings also "Origin Mother". I experience the Source as a motherly being with whom I can communicate, while at the same time she is "All that is".

This approach to existence provides a completely different perception and fundamental understanding of being an individual. What happened after the great expansion is very important because it greatly affects the situation on Earth today.

Eventually, unfortunate decisions were made, both by the Source itself and by the master-consciousnesses that the Source created with its thought. They could not see the consequences of their actions, even though they did their best in the situations they faced. The necessary experiences had to be made during t

he course of history. It is therefore unfortunate that people have been given an image of "god" through religions, as an all-powerful and all-knowing being.

The master consciousness that created physical life on Earth may be called the universal consciousness. He has been present for the humans throughout the ages. He has made many experiences throughout the history of mankind and learned from them, but he does not have all the answers, because what he has not previously experienced, he does not know enough about! It was always he who gave impulses to the many good tools and devices that people have created to make life easier, for example, the extraction of metals and the invention of the wheel.

Now he is determined that he does not want development on Earth to continue in the way it is now. He is very concerned that the influence of computer technology must be slowed down and that the Internet must be reduced, so that we use human resources. We put ourselves outside of life itself! - You have been given bodies and thoughts to use them and develop yourselves as individuals! he says.





DO BIOLOGISTS NEED TO THINK IN NEW WAYS?

I do not mean to attack science, but I write to show what I have found, which can add new perspectives. That is why I try to show pieces of ...